Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics85.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive287% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory117.5 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210615
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 20 '21 at 17:54
Run Duration262 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$416
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.25 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Memory 93.1
1-Core 146
2-Core 290
97% 176 Pts
4-Core 531
8-Core 1,120
96% 826 Pts
64-Core 2,947
182% 2,947 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Lighting 107
Reflection 114
Parallax 104
87% 108 fps
MRender 94.4
Gravity 104
Splatting 101
82% 99.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket 4.0 Plus 1TB
671GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT4P1.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3690 3947 2021 636 722 654 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
287% Outstanding
Read 2,150
Write 3583
Mixed 2,213
SusWrite 1,945
560% 2,473 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 92
4K Mixed 61.6
193% 65.5 MB/s
DQ Read 498
DQ Write 467
DQ Mixed 499
370% 488 MB/s
Poor: 194%
This bench: 287%
Great: 484%
XPG GAMMIX S11 Pro 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 42B4S9NA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1411 901 926 932 924 924 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
220% Outstanding
Read 2,229
Write 1,387
Mixed 1,306
SusWrite 1,003
330% 1,481 MB/s
4K Read 40.1
4K Write 67
4K Mixed 48.8
159% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 451
DQ Write 443
DQ Mixed 460
342% 451 MB/s
Poor: 196%
This bench: 220%
Great: 377%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
842GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 452 449 450 449 450 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 449
Mixed 433
SusWrite 451
103% 455 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 52.9
4K Mixed 39.4
127% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 238
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 215
161% 215 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 133%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190
198GB free
Firmware: DXM0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,245
Write 4,764
Mixed 4,437
1,005% 4,482 MB/s
4K Read 119
4K Write 93.8
4K Mixed 80.3
333% 97.6 MB/s
DQ Read 709
DQ Write 551
DQ Mixed 589
452% 616 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 116%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 189 192 191 191 192 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 165
Write 147
Mixed 86.8
SusWrite 191
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 102%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL32G36C16U4B.M16FB1 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
153% Outstanding
MC Read 86.1
MC Write 44.4
MC Mixed 46.6
169% 59 GB/s
SC Read 31.3
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 40.8
94% 32.9 GB/s
Latency 61.8
65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 88%
This bench: 153%
Great: 153%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 42.5" 1280 720 DEL41D6 DELL U4320Q
Typical ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING Builds (Compare 8,200 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING - $460

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,723
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback