Today's hottest deals

Asrock FM2A55M-DGS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics25.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A55M-DGS  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 17 '21 at 12:52
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5600K APU-$250
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Memory 82.7
1-Core 67.7
2-Core 126
57% 92.3 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 202
27% 204 Pts
64-Core 202
12% 202 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
Gigabyte(1458 3563) 3GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.9% Poor
Lighting 31.5
Reflection 29.5
Parallax 41.2
26% 34.1 fps
MRender 38.2
Gravity 30.3
Splatting 29.9
26% 32.8 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 8.2 67 6.5 4.8 9.4 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.9% Below average
Read 184
Write 124
Mixed 140
SusWrite 31.1
27% 120 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 35.2
4K Mixed 16.1
71% 24 MB/s
DQ Read 19.9
DQ Write 40.5
DQ Mixed 19.3
18% 26.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 85%
Hitachi HDS723020BLE640 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OAAB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 172 177 176 177 177 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 169
Mixed 28.4
SusWrite 176
100% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
150% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 103%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AE34G1339U2 8GB
667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.6% Below average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 10.9
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 11
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 69: 8R 7G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
69% 35% 65 236 82 60 21.6" 1920 1080 PHLC081 Philips 226VL
Typical FM2A55M-DGS Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A55M-DGS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $144
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback