Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H61-M LE/CSM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M LE/CSM  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110303
Uptime6 Days
Run DateOct 21 '19 at 01:52
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 73%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2300
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 92.3
1-Core 71.1
2-Core 154
64% 106 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 310
40% 303 Pts
64-Core 312
19% 312 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
EVGA(3842 2765) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
29.3% Poor
Lighting 34.3
Reflection 31
Parallax 39.2
28% 34.8 fps
MRender 42.5
Gravity 41.6
Splatting 34.8
32% 39.6 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SP1614C 160GB-$98
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SW100-27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 25 8.5 15 40 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Read 20.3
Write 36.7
Mixed 28
SusWrite 25.6
21% 27.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
80% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 32%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$20
172GB free
Firmware: CA12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 84 98 109 109 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 107
Write 104
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 102
68% 92.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AE34G1339U2 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
53.3% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 17.2
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 15.1
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 63.4
63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M LE/CSM Builds (Compare 270 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LE/CSM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $198
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback