Today's hottest deals

MSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 206%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 230%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics201% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive332% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C35
MotherboardMSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35)  (all builds)
Memory57.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210513
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateAug 07 '21 at 02:00
Run Duration318 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$261
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 89.2
1-Core 164
2-Core 326
104% 193 Pts
4-Core 636
8-Core 1,160
108% 898 Pts
64-Core 2,309
143% 2,309 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 104%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$721
MSI(1462 3892) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 4775 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
201% Outstanding
Lighting 297
Reflection 259
Parallax 295
242% 283 fps
MRender 313
Gravity 247
Splatting 180
195% 247 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 201%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$331
605GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT401.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2895 934 912 926 927 909 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
332% Outstanding
Read 2,168
Write 3,720
Mixed 2,227
SusWrite 1,250
530% 2,342 MB/s
4K Read 49.8
4K Write 261
4K Mixed 93
333% 134 MB/s
DQ Read 1,620
DQ Write 1,368
DQ Mixed 1,488
1,116% 1,492 MB/s
Poor: 207%
This bench: 332%
Great: 500%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
285GB free
Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2769 1930 1922 1922 1934 2053 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
425% Outstanding
Read 2,902
Write 3,344
Mixed 3,054
SusWrite 2,088
642% 2,847 MB/s
4K Read 83.3
4K Write 196
4K Mixed 116
379% 132 MB/s
DQ Read 1,504
DQ Write 1343
DQ Mixed 1,419
1,065% 1,422 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 425%
Great: 477%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$22
324GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 112 114 114 112 114 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 118
Write 111
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 113
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
108% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
927GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 145 147 146 142 144 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 165
Mixed 145
SusWrite 145
118% 158 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
215% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 109%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0108
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 60 55 59 56 61 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 127
Write 104
Mixed 81.8
SusWrite 57.6
68% 92.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
200% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 67%
WD Purple Surveillance 2TB (2017)-$67
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 142 145 145 140 142 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Read 136
Write 135
Mixed 64.7
SusWrite 143
87% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 104%
Patriot Memory 16GB
14GB free, PID 5500
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.3 3.7 8.1 21 20 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
8.37% Terrible
Read 24.4
Write 19.7
Mixed 10.4
SusWrite 12.3
21% 16.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.7
53% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.37%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C19 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
130% Outstanding
MC Read 60.9
MC Write 43.6
MC Mixed 42.4
140% 49 GB/s
SC Read 28.7
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 42.9
94% 32.8 GB/s
Latency 68.3
59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 130%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35) Builds (Compare 2,174 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 164%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35) - $358

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $1,515
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $220Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback