Today's hottest deals

Intel NUC7i5BNB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.17% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive74.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemIntel NUC7i5BNH
MotherboardIntel NUC7i5BNB  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 28 '21 at 08:21
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7260U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
69.8% Good
Memory 89.6
1-Core 108
2-Core 201
77% 133 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 290
39% 291 Pts
64-Core 298
18% 298 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus 640 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Intel(8086 2068) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6025
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
9.17% Terrible
Lighting 11.2
Reflection 9.2
Parallax 11.5
9% 10.6 fps
MRender 11.1
Gravity 11.3
Splatting 11.4
9% 11.3 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 9.17%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 86 70 63 67 67 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 438
Write 173
Mixed 304
SusWrite 88.2
55% 251 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 72.2
4K Mixed 31.2
132% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 239
DQ Write 276
DQ Mixed 183
158% 233 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905624-033.A00G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.3% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 11.7
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 10.3
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NUC7i5BNB Builds (Compare 442 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel NUC7i5BNB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $88
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback