Today's hottest deals

Intel NUC8BEB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.31% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive36.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemIntel(R) NUC8i7BEH
MotherboardIntel NUC8BEB  (all builds)
Memory2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201007
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 14 '21 at 21:07
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8559U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
67.5% Good
Memory 87
1-Core 103
2-Core 153
70% 115 Pts
4-Core 260
8-Core 510
46% 385 Pts
64-Core 551
34% 551 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
Intel(8086 2074) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
8.31% Terrible
Lighting 11.5
Reflection 10.9
Parallax 13
9% 11.8 fps
MRender 13.4
Gravity 12.4
Splatting 0.3
6% 8.7 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.31%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
893GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 190 199 205 206 198 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.8% Below average
Read 147
Write 216
Mixed 145
SusWrite 198
40% 176 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 24
4K Mixed 17.5
54% 17.9 MB/s
DQ Read 24.5
DQ Write 59.2
DQ Mixed 29.1
26% 37.6 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905624-033.A00G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
67.5% Good
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 35.6
MC Mixed 12.2
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 10.7
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NUC8BEB Builds (Compare 1,770 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel NUC8BEB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $69
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback