PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 28.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 63.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | MSI MS-7817 |
Motherboard | MSI H81M-P33 (MS-7817) (all builds) |
Memory | 14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180710 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jul 27 '21 at 21:46 |
Run Duration | 166 Seconds |
Run User | AUT-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
77.8%
Very good
|
78% 136 Pts
|
52% 392 Pts
|
24% 381 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Zotac(19DA A454) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.6%
Poor
|
29% 38 fps
|
27% 34.1 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Intel 330 Series 120GB-$188
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 300i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 118 117 116 118 114 MB/s
|
63.1%
Good
|
36% 161 MB/s
|
129% 48 MB/s
|
117% 160 MB/s
|
![]() WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
466GB free
Firmware: 1H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 120 121 122 121 123 MB/s
|
70.3%
Very good
|
80% 108 MB/s
|
171% 1.17 MB/s
|
|
![]() Corsair Flash Voyager 32GB
13GB free, PID 1ab1
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 9.8 9.8 9.8 9.8 9.4 MB/s
|
7.49%
Terrible
|
14% 12.2 MB/s
|
27% 2.43 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Elpida 99U5403-159.A01LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
62.1%
Good
|
62% 21.5 GB/s
|
55% 19.3 GB/s
|
58% 68.9 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 11 | 9 | 60 | 23" | 1280 720 | SAM0CB0 S23E650 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 910x |
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 445x |
Core i7-4790Intel $132Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 394x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 379x |
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 299x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 282x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 74% - Very good | Total price: $354 |