Today's hottest deals

Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive197% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory52.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200113
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 24 '21 at 23:30
Run Duration259 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$90
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Memory 70.9
1-Core 140
2-Core 278
87% 163 Pts
4-Core 525
8-Core 769
81% 647 Pts
64-Core 955
59% 955 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 471.41
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
106% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 119
Parallax 119
97% 119 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 240
Splatting 119
128% 159 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 106%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 2 1TB
254GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 230 138 145 147 139 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
197% Outstanding
Read 2,378
Write 2,289
Mixed 1,472
SusWrite 205
353% 1,586 MB/s
4K Read 49.6
4K Write 80.5
4K Mixed 58.6
193% 62.9 MB/s
DQ Read 670
DQ Write 646
DQ Mixed 446
393% 587 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 197%
Great: 413%
Amd-raid Array 3 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 127 132 128 130 125 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 139
Write 112
Mixed 94.5
SusWrite 127
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.4
150% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 196%
Amd-raid Array 4 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 173 174 173 174 174 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Read 157
Write 126
Mixed 148
SusWrite 173
112% 151 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.4
240% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 190%
Amd-raid Hitachi HDT72101 1TB
264GB free
Firmware: ST6O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 68 74 73 75 73 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
52% Above average
Read 108
Write 29.4
Mixed 51.3
SusWrite 72.3
48% 65.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
184% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 52%
Great: 52%
Seagate Expansion+ 5TB
188GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 109 118 119 112 111 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 57.9
Write 72.2
Mixed 65.6
SusWrite 112
57% 76.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.5
140% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK64GX4M2D3600C18 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
MC Read 37.2
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 38.3
95% 33.1 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 35.5
77% 27 GB/s
Latency 99.3
40% 99.3 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 47: 5R 6G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
47% 22% 67 92 8 120 48.8" 5120 1440 SAM0F9C C49RG9x
Typical X570 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 2,979 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $650
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback