Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JA_X515JA

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JA_X515JA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X515JA
Memory	15.1 GB free of 20 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210223
Uptime	5.2 Days
Run Date	Jul 21 '21 at 15:58
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	NGA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-1005G1 22,960 User benchmarks, average bench 44% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	62.6% Good	Memory 73.7 1-Core 126 2-Core 219 78% 139 Pts	4-Core 298 8-Core 305 40% 302 Pts	64-Core 302 19% 302 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD G1 68,603 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 14F2) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9565 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	4.51% Terrible	Lighting 7 Reflection 6.3 Parallax 7.8 6% 7.03 fps	MRender 8.2 Gravity 1 Splatting 0.2 2% 3.13 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.51% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 385GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 442 451 408 458 455 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 445 Write 368 Mixed 335 SusWrite 426 88% 393 MB/s	4K Read 31.1 4K Write 66.3 4K Mixed 40.9 135% 46.1 MB/s	DQ Read 365 DQ Write 314 DQ Mixed 336 253% 339 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 134%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-2G6J1 20GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 3200, 2667 MHz 4096, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	54.7% Above average	MC Read 20.2 MC Write 20 MC Mixed 16.6 54% 18.9 GB/s	SC Read 17.4 SC Write 20.2 SC Mixed 17.7 53% 18.4 GB/s	Latency 93.2 43% 93.2 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	1	1	60	15.5"	1366 715	CMN15E6

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JA_X515JA Builds (Compare 706 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JA_X515JA

CPU
Core i3-1005G1IntelBench 44%, 22,960 samples	377x
Core i5-1035G1IntelBench 51%, 53,170 samples	285x
Core i7-1065G7IntelBench 53%, 58,314 samples	43x

GPU
UHD G1IntelBench 5%, 68,603 samples	662x
Iris Plus G7IntelBench 9%, 52,498 samples	43x
GeForce RTX 3090 TiNvidiaBench 7%, 1 sample	1x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	142x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 134%, 10,140 samples	84x
MZVLQ256HAJD-00000 256GBSamsungBench 113%, 7,359 samples	83x

RAM
4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 Hynix HMA851S6DJR6N-XN 8GBMicronBench 71%, 1,143 samples	124x
M471A5244CB0-CWE Hynix HMA851S6DJR6N-XN 8GBSamsungBench 57%, 2,191 samples	112x
M471A5244CB0-CWE 1x4GBSamsungBench 34%, 6,590 samples	89x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16