Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4100 6,492 User benchmarks, average bench 33% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	38.8% Below average	Memory 44.1 1-Core 50.9 2-Core 99.4 38% 64.8 Pts	4-Core 195 8-Core 191 26% 193 Pts	64-Core 191 12% 191 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 506E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.9% Terrible	Lighting 2.1 Reflection 1.1 Parallax 2.4 2% 1.87 fps	MRender 2.4 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 3.4 2% 2.67 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.9% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
TOSHIBA MQ04ABF100 1TB 991 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 299GB free, PID 0237 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 109 127 126 128 124 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	49.1% Average	Read 140 Write 142 Mixed 20 SusWrite 124 138% 106 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.5 39% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 52%
Generic MassStorageClass 64GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 8GB free, PID 0761 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 8.9 9.5 9.1 9.3 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	8.29% Terrible	Read 21.7 Write 12.3 Mixed 8.8 SusWrite 9.4 16% 13 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.7 62% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.29% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 1x4GB 5,693 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	24.4% Poor	MC Read 9.3 MC Write 9.4 MC Mixed 9.2 27% 9.3 GB/s	SC Read 3.2 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 4 11% 3.87 GB/s	Latency 184 22% 184 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 24.4% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
14%	6%	103	20	16	60	21.5"	1920 1080	ANK2150 L215ZH

History: Score 24: 4R 1G 1B | Score 20: 2R 3G 1B | Score 25: 2R 4G 3B | Score 14: 1R 2G 3B

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16