Asrock A320M/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics87.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock A320M/ac  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.4 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200716
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 19 '21 at 18:50
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 3 3100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Memory 80.1
1-Core 126
2-Core 242
85% 149 Pts
4-Core 439
8-Core 696
72% 568 Pts
64-Core 708
48% 708 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
EVGA(3842 4998) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1582 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 126
Parallax 120
89% 119 fps
MRender 104
Gravity 107
Splatting 98.9
86% 103 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 90%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
412GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 220 215 222 219 219 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 482
Mixed 221
SusWrite 220
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 53
183% 66.9 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 244
205% 300 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 105%
Great: 113%
WDC WDBNCE0010PNC 1TB
164GB free
Firmware: 415000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 193 133 220 187 160 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 206
Write 397
Mixed 130
SusWrite 179
52% 228 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 30.7
132% 55.2 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 152
143% 230 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 117%
WD WD40EDAZ-11SLVB0 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 182 181 182 180 182 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 57% Great: 102%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Adata DDR4 3200 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3400 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
MC Read 32.6
MC Write 25
MC Mixed 30.4
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 25.9
SC Write 25.4
SC Mixed 34.2
81% 28.5 GB/s
Latency 80.4
50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 33: 4R 3G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
33% 25% 44 111 7 60 84.6" 2048 1080 SAM7017 SAMSUNG
Typical A320M/ac Builds (Compare 3,054 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock A320M/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 35% - Below average Total price: $1,054
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Intel Core i7-11700K $346Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback