Asrock H310CM-HDV

Performance Results


Gaming 55% Gunboat	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 46% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	72.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	33% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H310CM-HDV (all builds)
Memory	11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190514
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Jul 17 '21 at 08:53
Run Duration	202 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$96 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	74.5% Very good	Memory 77.4 1-Core 106 2-Core 204 73% 129 Pts	4-Core 392 8-Core 525 58% 459 Pts	64-Core 543 34% 543 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143 318,562 User benchmarks, average bench 76% Asus(1043 86A3) CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	72.8% Very good	Lighting 92.4 Reflection 92 Parallax 83.6 75% 89.3 fps	MRender 93.8 Gravity 86.4 Splatting 72.8 68% 84.3 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team T253X2512G 512GB 14,867 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 282GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0509A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 216 50 44 68 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	33% Below average	Read 410 Write 346 Mixed 14.7 SusWrite 112 49% 221 MB/s	4K Read 16.8 4K Write 7.8 4K Mixed 4 35% 9.53 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 100%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 113GB free Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 361 376 372 365 365 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 402 Write 381 Mixed 329 SusWrite 358 83% 368 MB/s	4K Read 33.7 4K Write 79.1 4K Mixed 46.2 152% 53 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 322 DQ Mixed 342 258% 347 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 129%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$36 163,634 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	45.7% Average	MC Read 17.8 MC Write 14.6 MC Mixed 15.6 46% 16 GB/s	SC Read 10.9 SC Write 13.5 SC Mixed 14.5 37% 13 GB/s	Latency 85.5 47% 85.5 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 42: 5R 4G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
42%	39%	36	249	121	144	23.5"	1920 1080	MSI1462 Optix G24C

History: Score 19: 1R 4G 2B | Score 42: 5R 4G 5B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H310CM-HDV Builds (Compare 3,827 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H310CM-HDV

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $96Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,305x
Core i3-9100FIntel $135Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	1,149x
Core i5-8400Intel $127Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	136x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	567x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	310x
RTX 2060Nvidia $294Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	267x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	181x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $51Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	135x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	127x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	93x
PSD48G266681 2x8GBPatriotBench 79%, 6,425 samples	81x
CM4X8GD3200C16K2E 2x8GBCorsairBench 84%, 6,228 samples	72x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $279

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16