Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results


Gaming 206% UFO	Desktop 102% UFO	Workstation 229% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	206% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER (all builds)
Memory	10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210521
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 15 '21 at 02:59
Run Duration	291 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Memory 90.3 1-Core 160 2-Core 317 102% 189 Pts	4-Core 610 8-Core 1,197 107% 903 Pts	64-Core 2,149 133% 2,149 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,148 158,856 User benchmarks, average bench 210% Asus(1043 87B3) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing below potential (39^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	206% Outstanding	Lighting 303 Reflection 290 Parallax 330 247% 307 fps	MRender 346 Gravity 250 Splatting 185 204% 260 fps
Poor: 185% ↑ This bench: 206% Great: 230%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 512GB-$150 16,934 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVM02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 10,417 Write 6,516 Mixed 8,290 1,864% 8,408 MB/s	4K Read 621 4K Write 468 4K Mixed 120 1,343% 403 MB/s	DQ Read 1,416 DQ Write 1,323 DQ Mixed 1409 1,047% 1,383 MB/s
Poor: 79% Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 125GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 457 459 458 461 462 462 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	117% Outstanding	Read 511 Write 458 Mixed 461 SusWrite 460 106% 473 MB/s	4K Read 41.8 4K Write 97.9 4K Mixed 56.6 188% 65.4 MB/s	DQ Read 245 DQ Write 197 DQ Mixed 218 164% 220 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 133%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 118GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,703 Write 2623 Mixed 1,987 543% 2,438 MB/s	4K Read 69.2 4K Write 193 4K Mixed 99.9 335% 121 MB/s	DQ Read 1,446 DQ Write 1,220 DQ Mixed 1,330 997% 1,332 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 219GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 71 76 75 76 75 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	51.4% Above average	Read 104 Write 90.1 Mixed 106 SusWrite 74.5 70% 93.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 165% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 76%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$174 9,888 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 1TB free Firmware: 81.H0A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 143 138 138 145 138 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	86% Excellent	Read 158 Write 166 Mixed 77 SusWrite 140 99% 135 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 6.3 4K Mixed 0.6 225% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 86% Great: 113%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$174 9,888 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 31GB free Firmware: 81.H0A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 165 174 150 133 152 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	88% Excellent	Read 151 Write 148 Mixed 63.9 SusWrite 155 94% 129 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 5.6 4K Mixed 0.7 227% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 88% Great: 113%
WD Black 6TB (2016)-$235 6,443 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 163GB free Firmware: 81.H0A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 187 193 174 187 189 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	86.2% Excellent	Read 113 Write 119 Mixed 63.7 SusWrite 186 88% 120 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 5.7 4K Mixed 0.7 229% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 86.2% Great: 121%
SanDisk Ultra 32GB 8,520 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 15GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 33 13 14 13 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	36.7% Below average	Read 152 Write 37.3 Mixed 61.3 SusWrite 25.7 75% 69.1 MB/s	4K Read 6.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 3.3 220% 4.2 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 36%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB 1,418 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	126% Outstanding	MC Read 52.5 MC Write 45.6 MC Mixed 42.5 134% 46.9 GB/s	SC Read 29.2 SC Write 27.6 SC Mixed 40.8 93% 32.5 GB/s	Latency 66.8 60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 126% Great: 126%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	144	38.2"	1280 720	GSM7735 38GL950G

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,028 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 184%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 201%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $550

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $260Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	1,163x
Ryzen 9 5950XAMD $416Bench 100%, 33,026 samples	869x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	869x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $600Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	608x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	528x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,148Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	489x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $102Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	479x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	312x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $168Bench 416%, 138,083 samples	212x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	290x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GBG.SKILLBench 110%, 12,538 samples	158x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 106%, 11,505 samples	94x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $1,512

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16