MSI H310-F PRO (MS-7B25)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 74% Battleship	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 63% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	89.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star H310 Gaming Codex 3F (MS-B913)
Motherboard	MSI H310-F PRO (MS-7B25) (all builds)
Memory	10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190305
Uptime	6.8 Days
Run Date	Jul 07 '21 at 14:12
Run Duration	250 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	21%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$95 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	84% Excellent	Memory 91.3 1-Core 124 2-Core 245 86% 153 Pts	4-Core 413 8-Core 640 65% 526 Pts	64-Core 640 40% 640 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 84% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$290 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% MSI(1462 8C9F) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.77 Performing below potential (47^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	89.4% Excellent	Lighting 112 Reflection 105 Parallax 108 91% 108 fps	MRender 135 Gravity 97.7 Splatting 88.6 85% 107 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 89.4% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SB8W128G 128GB 279 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 6GB free (System drive) Firmware: X6107000 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 463 Write 237 Mixed 184 64% 294 MB/s	4K Read 26.1 4K Write 51.4 4K Mixed 30.2 106% 35.9 MB/s	DQ Read 300 DQ Write 174 DQ Mixed 212 164% 228 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 90%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 276GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 147 148 149 147 150 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	84.5% Excellent	Read 146 Write 150 Mixed 107 SusWrite 148 102% 138 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.2 244% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 859B CT8G4DFS8266.M8FD 16GB 58 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	71.6% Very good	MC Read 29.5 MC Write 24.5 MC Mixed 22.3 73% 25.4 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 25.2 SC Mixed 20.9 58% 20.5 GB/s	Latency 65.2 61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 61: 7R 5G 11B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
61%	25%	91	271	189	144	34"	3440 1440	AOC3402 U34G2G4R3

History: Score 41: 5R 3G 7B | Score 58: 8R 4G 6B | Score 61: 7R 5G 11B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H310-F PRO (MS-7B25) Builds (Compare 309 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 77%

Battleship

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 64%

Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI H310-F PRO (MS-7B25)

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $95Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	161x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	37x
Core i5-8400Intel $129Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	23x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $290Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	65x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	48x
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	27x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	18x
SD9SB8W128G 128GBSandiskBench 77%, 279 samples	9x
MX500 1TBCrucial $86Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	9x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	38x
PSD48G240081 2x8GBPatriotBench 75%, 3,770 samples	20x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 2x8GBUnknownBench 75%, 25,824 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $413

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16