Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	21 GB free of 24 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20140401
Uptime	12.7 Days
Run Date	Jul 06 '21 at 19:08
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	29%

PC Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Common KVM processor 2,228 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	35% Below average	Memory 38.7 1-Core 42.9 2-Core 88 33% 56.5 Pts	4-Core 171 8-Core 235 26% 203 Pts	64-Core 285 18% 285 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 98%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 1.5TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 823GB free Firmware: 2.5+ SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 12 11 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	4.95% Terrible	Read 62 Write 20.7 Mixed 34.3 SusWrite 11.3 7% 32.1 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 1.1 6% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 4.95% Great: 36%
Qemu HARDDISK 429GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 345GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.5+ SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 9.9 10 9.5 9 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	28.7% Poor	Read 89 Write 19 Mixed 30.3 SusWrite 9.9 27% 37 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 1.4 333% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 94%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 24GB 506 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 0, 0 MHz 16384, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	31.1% Below average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 9.8 MC Mixed 11.5 36% 12.5 GB/s	SC Read 4.2 SC Write 2.2 SC Mixed 3.4 9% 3.27 GB/s	Latency 208 19% 208 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 133%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 124%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 127%

UFO

CPU
Gen Intel Core i7-12700K12thBench 99%, 67 samples	5x
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-CoreAMDBench 85%, 74 samples	4x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	4x

SSD
Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GBCorsairBench 230%, 32,020 samples	4x
SM841 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 1,284 samples	3x
HARDDISK 86GBQemuBench 42%, 75 samples	3x

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485