Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory21 GB free of 24 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime12.7 Days
Run DateJul 06 '21 at 19:08
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Common KVM processor
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
35% Below average
Memory 38.7
1-Core 42.9
2-Core 88
33% 56.5 Pts
4-Core 171
8-Core 235
26% 203 Pts
64-Core 285
18% 285 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35%
Great: 98%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 1.5TB
823GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 12 11 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
4.95% Terrible
Read 62
Write 20.7
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 11.3
7% 32.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.1
6% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 4.95%
Great: 36%
Qemu HARDDISK 429GB
345GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 9.9 10 9.5 9 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Read 89
Write 19
Mixed 30.3
SusWrite 9.9
27% 37 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.4
333% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 24GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
31.1% Below average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 11.5
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 2.2
SC Mixed 3.4
9% 3.27 GB/s
Latency 208
19% 208 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Builds (Compare 99 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback