QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive36.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemQEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory10.2 GB free of 14 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 16 '22 at 03:47
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6850K-$115
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
68.8% Good
Memory 74.4
1-Core 114
2-Core 187
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 442
51% 396 Pts
64-Core 438
27% 438 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 125
Reflection 131
Parallax 137
102% 131 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 158
Splatting 110
102% 126 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 102%
Great: 133%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 1.5TB
280GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 162 105 96 75 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.2% Below average
Read 435
Write 435
Mixed 432
SusWrite 134
81% 359 MB/s
4K Read 9.4
4K Write 8.5
4K Mixed 8.9
30% 8.93 MB/s
DQ Read 30
DQ Write 25.2
DQ Mixed 24.2
19% 26.5 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x14GB
1 of 1 slots used
14GB DIMM RAM
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 46.4
MC Mixed 36.3
109% 38.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 18.8
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 91.5
44% 91.5 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback