Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Z270X-Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170707
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateJul 03 '21 at 02:15
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$148
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Memory 90.4
1-Core 138
2-Core 252
90% 160 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 662
69% 555 Pts
64-Core 648
40% 648 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
Gigabyte(1458 377A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
111% Outstanding
Lighting 146
Reflection 154
Parallax 145
119% 148 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 161
Splatting 114
105% 130 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 111%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 307 273 250 242 221 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 440
Write 432
Mixed 368
SusWrite 286
86% 382 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 54.9
178% 64.9 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 360
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 107%
Great: 134%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$66
933GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 167 169 168 169 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 150
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 168
94% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.9
349% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 110%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$66
847GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 440 457 447 427 426 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 448
Write 436
Mixed 406
SusWrite 437
321% 432 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 53.7
9,580% 66.9 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 360
3,312% 362 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GX-D4-3200-MR 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
56.7% Above average
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 18.1
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 19.2
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 70: 8R 8G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
70% 41% 54 321 255 144 23.8" 2048 1152 ACR0526 XB241YU
Typical GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 1,933 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming - $165

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $650
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback