MSI Z270 KRAIT GAMING (MS-7A59)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7A59
MotherboardMSI Z270 KRAIT GAMING (MS-7A59)  (all builds)
Memory23.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170331
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 01 '21 at 08:18
Run Duration237 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
76% Very good
Memory 76.9
1-Core 123
2-Core 218
78% 139 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 627
64% 516 Pts
64-Core 631
39% 631 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 76%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Asus(1043 85E8) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
103% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 142
Parallax 145
104% 138 fps
MRender 122
Gravity 137
Splatting 122
104% 127 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 103%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 233 212 200 200 194 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 451
Write 392
Mixed 348
SusWrite 240
80% 358 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 56
187% 66.1 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 351
264% 354 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 107%
Great: 134%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
265GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 422 431 442 427 415 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 461
Write 443
Mixed 430
SusWrite 423
99% 439 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 54.5
187% 67.5 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 352
264% 352 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 118%
Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
839GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 177 177 176 174 176 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Read 160
Write 126
Mixed 80.7
SusWrite 175
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 96%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 171 179 174 177 172 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 120
Mixed 79.7
SusWrite 173
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 029E CMK8GX4M1A2400C14 029E CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 029E CMK8GX4M1A2400C14 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.7% Good
MC Read 24.2
MC Write 25.3
MC Mixed 21.6
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 25.5
SC Mixed 20.1
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 86.5
46% 86.5 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 56: 6R 6G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
56% 50% 40 244 181 60 27" 2048 1152 ACR048F XB271HU
History: Score 14: 2R 1G 1B | Score 56: 6R 6G 8B
Typical Z270 KRAIT GAMING (MS-7A59) Builds (Compare 714 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI Z270 KRAIT GAMING (MS-7A59) - $146

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $738
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback