MSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35)

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	32.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C35
Motherboard	MSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35) (all builds)
Memory	8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210122
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jun 17 '21 at 23:41
Run Duration	342 Seconds
Run User	SRB-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$245 60,132 User benchmarks, average bench 99% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	86% Excellent	Memory 90.2 1-Core 110 2-Core 220 80% 140 Pts	4-Core 440 8-Core 837 76% 638 Pts	64-Core 1,669 103% 1,669 Pts
Poor: 87% ↑ This bench: 86% Great: 108%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 280-$185 33,175 User benchmarks, average bench 30% Gigabyte(1458 229A) 3GB CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 21.10.01.07 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	32.5% Below average	Lighting 43.2 Reflection 36.7 Parallax 56.6 35% 45.5 fps	MRender 32.3 Gravity 44.5 Splatting 25.4 27% 34.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 34%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 1TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 252GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 1925 1490 1495 1441 1379 1347 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 39% Great: 70%
Amd-raid Array 4 1TB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 205% 810GB free Firmware: 9.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 4411 4432 4436 4427 4409 4396 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	491% Outstanding	Read 2,725 Write 4436 Mixed 2,038 SusWrite 4,418 773% 3,404 MB/s	4K Read 54.9 4K Write 128 4K Mixed 69.6 240% 84.1 MB/s	DQ Read 808 DQ Write 906 DQ Mixed 897 664% 871 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 491% Great: 491%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 516GB free Firmware: 80.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 75 74 73 75 73 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	40.4% Average	Read 66.7 Write 63 Mixed 38.5 SusWrite 73.7 44% 60.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 40.4% Great: 59%
Amd-raid Array 2 1TB 455 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 451GB free Firmware: 9.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 75 74 73 75 73 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	40.8% Average	Read 67.7 Write 84 Mixed 56.3 SusWrite 73.9 52% 70.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 179% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 106%
SanDisk' Cruzer Fit 16GB 1,420 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 5GB free, PID 5571 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 7 6.8 6.4 7.1 7.2 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	16% Very poor	Read 34.5 Write 18.5 Mixed 13 SusWrite 7.3 21% 18.3 MB/s	4K Read 7.5 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 3.1 218% 4.37 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 19%
Verbatim STORE N GO 249GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 32GB free, PID 0243 Operating at USB 3.2 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 38 0.1 38 38 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Write 27.5 Mixed 146 SusWrite 22 105% 65.2 MB/s	4K Read 14.1 4K Write 16.3 4K Mixed 10 947% 13.5 MB/s	DQ Read 18.9 DQ Write 15.9 DQ Mixed 11.2 992% 15.3 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 15,285 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	120% Outstanding	MC Read 52.6 MC Write 40 MC Mixed 42.1 128% 44.9 GB/s	SC Read 27.5 SC Write 24.2 SC Mixed 39.2 87% 30.3 GB/s	Latency 66.9 60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 11: 1R 2G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
11%	50%	6	78	8	60	27"	2560 1440	AOC2701 Q27P1B

History:

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35) Builds (Compare 2,125 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 164%

UFO

Desktop 95%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 187%

UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35) - $358

CPU
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	453x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $245Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	446x
Ryzen 9 5950XAMD $416Bench 100%, 33,026 samples	341x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	239x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,198Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	214x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	207x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	167x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	156x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $170Bench 416%, 138,083 samples	105x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	97x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GBG.SKILLBench 110%, 12,538 samples	70x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $128Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	49x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $1,758

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16