Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics46.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive134% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory17.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210407
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJun 13 '21 at 19:52
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$460
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Memory 73.1
1-Core 137
2-Core 268
88% 159 Pts
4-Core 531
8-Core 983
94% 757 Pts
64-Core 2,099
141% 2,099 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$340
Gigabyte(1458 3671) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.8% Average
Lighting 60
Reflection 43.4
Parallax 22.7
48% 42 fps
MRender 62.1
Gravity 55
Splatting 0.2
45% 39.1 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 56%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB (2017)-$130
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B35900WD Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 204 199 187 189 148 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 1,030
Write 644
Mixed 429
SusWrite 187
126% 573 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 51.1
180% 64.2 MB/s
DQ Read 660
DQ Write 502
DQ Mixed 320
310% 494 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 134%
Great: 142%
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$261
259GB free
Firmware: X41100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 184 200 170 176 135 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 364
Write 359
Mixed 215
SusWrite 199
64% 284 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 38.9
4K Mixed 25
80% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 114
109% 173 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 106%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$120
180GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 381 346 300 309 305 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Read 476
Write 433
Mixed 353
SusWrite 332
90% 399 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 76.3
4K Mixed 50.7
164% 55.3 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 198
148% 198 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 133%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$42
515GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 118 121 121 120 118 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 109
Write 113
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 118
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 85%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$42
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 150 157 157 157 157 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Read 159
Write 101
Mixed 93.3
SusWrite 153
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston KHX2666C16/8G KHX2666C16/8G KHX2400C15D4/8G KHX2400C15D4/8G 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
79.6% Very good
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 28.8
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 21.3
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 27.4
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 94.4
42% 94.4 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING Builds (Compare 25,053 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 177%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 204%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING - $325

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,629
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $72G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback