Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	37.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	24.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 970-$1,141 4,313 User benchmarks, average bench 73% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	64.1% Good	Memory 80 1-Core 73.2 2-Core 142 59% 98.3 Pts	4-Core 261 8-Core 456 43% 359 Pts	64-Core 625 39% 625 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126 94,030 User benchmarks, average bench 40% Asus(1043 04B0) CLim: 1250 MHz, MLim: 1650 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.4.1 Performing below potential (47^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	37.6% Below average	Lighting 44.1 Reflection 58.2 Parallax 66.7 36% 56.3 fps	MRender 57.4 Gravity 51.3 Splatting 43.4 41% 50.7 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 47%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Gigastone Prime Series 256GB 167 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 91GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0817A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 105 68 50 53 43 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	24.7% Poor	Read 219 Write 194 Mixed 17.5 SusWrite 83.1 28% 128 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 20.3 4K Mixed 9.9 26% 10.7 MB/s	DQ Read 24.3 DQ Write 77.8 DQ Mixed 22.2 25% 41.4 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 24.7% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 6 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	32.9% Below average	MC Read 13.4 MC Write 10.9 MC Mixed 9.4 32% 11.2 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 9.9 23% 8.17 GB/s	Latency 80.6 50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 97%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 29%

Raft

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $306

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16