Lenovo F0FA0000US

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemLenovo F0FA0000US  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 371F
Memory1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210331
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateJun 07 '21 at 00:19
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Memory 91
1-Core 106
2-Core 209
78% 135 Pts
4-Core 371
8-Core 661
62% 516 Pts
64-Core 836
52% 836 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 371F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8783
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
6.11% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 9.4
Parallax 7.7
5% 7.83 fps
MRender 10.9
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 10.9
8% 9.43 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.11%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HBHQ-000L7 256GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4M2QEXH7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,764
Write 1,973
Mixed 883
343% 1,540 MB/s
4K Read 56.3
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 72.7
241% 82.6 MB/s
DQ Read 812
DQ Write 537
DQ Mixed 712
521% 687 MB/s
Poor: 82% Great: 279%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
130GB free
Firmware: LFM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 65 64 62 61 61 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 104
Write 120
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 62.6
64% 87.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
111% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 71%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 050B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 37
Write 37.9
Mixed 28.7
SusWrite 15.2
22% 29.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
114% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 91%
Seagate BUP Portable 4TB
612GB free
Firmware: 1707
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 15 14 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Read 34.5
Write 35
Mixed 34.4
SusWrite 14.6
22% 29.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.6
165% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 69%
WD easystore 2647 5TB
4TB free, PID 2647
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 43 43 42 42 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
21.3% Poor
Read 41.7
Write 38.9
Mixed 32.2
SusWrite 41.6
52% 38.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
104% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 66%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 250GB
223GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 65 66 31 22 14 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 112
Write 53.2
Mixed 62.9
SusWrite 43.4
83% 67.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.5
132% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 36%
SDXC Card 1TB
449GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 18 17 28 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Read 23.9
Write 27
Mixed 23.4
SusWrite 24.6
34% 24.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 3.7
247% 3.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 46%
Seagate GoFlex Desk 3TB
833GB free, PID 50a5
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Read 28.6
Write 28.2
Mixed 23.7
SusWrite 12.6
31% 23.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
64% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.7% Above average
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 16.3
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 24.6
SC Mixed 22
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F0FA0000US Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo F0FA0000US

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback