Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 380-$130 21,755 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 0.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	25.8% Poor	Memory 44.2 1-Core 18.1 2-Core 29.9 22% 30.7 Pts	4-Core 45.7 8-Core 45.3 6% 45.5 Pts	64-Core 41.7 3% 41.7 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 25.8% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 330M 7,697 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sanyo(144D C06A) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	2.47% Terrible	Lighting 2.8 Reflection 2.6 Parallax 1.1 2% 2.17 fps	MRender 5.1 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 3.2 3% 3.53 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.47% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk S3 500G 500GB 12,292 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 408GB free (System drive) Firmware: 415000RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 104 153 170 145 159 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.2% Below average	Read 215 Write 195 Mixed 163 SusWrite 148 40% 180 MB/s	4K Read 14.7 4K Write 16.8 4K Mixed 14.3 50% 15.3 MB/s	DQ Read 107 DQ Write 84.2 DQ Mixed 76.3 62% 89 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 116%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5673FH0-CF8 2x2GB 6,000 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 533 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	15.9% Very poor	MC Read 4.8 MC Write 5.3 MC Mixed 6.6 16% 5.57 GB/s	SC Read 3.8 SC Write 3.4 SC Mixed 3.6 10% 3.6 GB/s	Latency 184 22% 184 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 41%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GT 330MNvidiaBench 2%, 7,697 samples	101x
GeForce 310MNvidiaBench 1%, 8,303 samples	34x

RAM
M471B5673FH0-CF8 2x2GBSamsungBench 25%, 6,000 samples	48x
EBJ21UE8BDS0-AE-F 2x2GBUnknownBench 23%, 1,093 samples	9x
M471B5773CHS-CF8 2x2GBSamsungBench 26%, 995 samples	4x

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16