Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire 5733

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 4 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAcer Aspire 5733  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire 5733
Memory5.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120321
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJun 02 '21 at 09:26
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 580-$250
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
48.8% Average
Memory 64.5
1-Core 75.5
2-Core 152
56% 97.4 Pts
4-Core 193
8-Core 190
26% 192 Pts
64-Core 189
12% 189 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Acer(1025 0601) 2.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2993
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.81% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 1
1% 1.2 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.2
1% 1.17 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.81%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$25
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 74 71 73 74 75 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 76.6
Write 74.8
Mixed 51.7
SusWrite 72.7
51% 68.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M471B5674QH0-YK0 ACR512X64D3S16C11G 6GB
1067, 1067 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.9% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 9.6
23% 8.03 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 7.2
19% 6.67 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 5733 Builds (Compare 146 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 5733

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $192
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback