Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics150% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory14.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170723
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateMay 19 '21 at 16:22
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$190
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
51.7% Above average
Memory 69
1-Core 98.5
2-Core 157
63% 108 Pts
4-Core 191
8-Core 248
28% 219 Pts
64-Core 270
17% 270 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400
Asus(1043 87C1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
150% Outstanding
Lighting 220
Reflection 212
Parallax 201
179% 211 fps
MRender 200
Gravity 156
Splatting 137
131% 164 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 150%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,763
Write 1,415
Mixed 714
286% 1,298 MB/s
4K Read 46.6
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 54.3
205% 74.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,049
DQ Write 718
DQ Mixed 751
596% 839 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$79
159GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 143 146 143 149 149 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 172
Mixed 77.6
SusWrite 144
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
117% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 114%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB
458GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 90 91 91 91 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 86.7
Write 89
Mixed 35
SusWrite 90.7
55% 75.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
64.2% Good
MC Read 20
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 23.9
67% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 18.6
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX Z270F GAMING Builds (Compare 6,102 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING - $439

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $1,052
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback