Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom D525-$250 2,196 User benchmarks, average bench 23% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	19% Very poor	Memory 36.3 1-Core 5.6 2-Core 5.3 14% 15.7 Pts	4-Core 11.9 8-Core 17.8 2% 14.8 Pts	64-Core 16 1% 16 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 19% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33 44,469 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 184GB free (System drive) Firmware: HP34 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 74 70 77 43 35 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	21.4% Poor	Read 12.7 Write 74.7 Mixed 30.9 SusWrite 61.7 33% 45 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.4 76% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 21.4% Great: 68%
Toshiba MQ01ABD032 320GB-$50 10,446 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 238GB free Firmware: AX001F SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 53 78 32 66 3.5 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	35.8% Below average	Read 78.5 Write 68.1 Mixed 28.9 SusWrite 46 40% 55.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 111% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 35.8% Great: 54%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown.A346G.C270C 1x2GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR2 800 MHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	6.53% Terrible	MC Read 2.1 MC Write 2.7 MC Mixed 1 6% 1.93 GB/s	SC Read 1.5 SC Write 3 SC Mixed 0.6 5% 1.7 GB/s	Latency 220 18% 220 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 6.53% Great: 28%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16