Today's hottest deals

Zotac NM10

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 14%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardZotac NM10  (all builds)
Memory2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110505
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '21 at 23:48
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom D525-$250
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Memory 21.3
1-Core 7.5
2-Core 10.4
10% 13.1 Pts
4-Core 23.6
8-Core 23.4
3% 23.5 Pts
64-Core 19.8
1% 19.8 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 28%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia ION
Zotac(19DA 3100) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
0.57% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 0.3
1% 0.7 fps
MRender 0.4
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 0.1
0% 0.33 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.57%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ VERTEX3 90GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 106 102 93 88 96 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.5% Poor
Read 180
Write 111
Mixed 142
SusWrite 98.7
30% 133 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 18.2
4K Mixed 12.3
45% 14.5 MB/s
DQ Read 23.4
DQ Write 36.8
DQ Mixed 23.3
20% 27.8 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 77%
VendorCo ProductCode 32GB
28GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 15 13 13 15 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
5.36% Terrible
Read 14.8
Write 8.8
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 14.3
14% 10.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
2% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.36%
Great: 9%
Generic- Multi-Card 128GB
92GB free, PID 0138
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 14 15 12 14 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 16.9
Write 15.9
Mixed 17.4
SusWrite 14.5
22% 16.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.2
121% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4GB
800, 800 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
9.51% Terrible
MC Read 3.8
MC Write 3.2
MC Mixed 3.1
10% 3.37 GB/s
SC Read 1.3
SC Write 2.6
SC Mixed 2.2
6% 2.03 GB/s
Latency 311
13% 311 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 9.51%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NM10 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

Motherboard: Zotac NM10

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 24% - Poor Total price: $250
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback