Today's hottest deals

MSI A320M PRO-E (MS-7A36)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.37% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive73.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A36
MotherboardMSI A320M PRO-E (MS-7A36)  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190122
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateMay 08 '21 at 12:35
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-9600 APU (2016 D.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Memory 66.7
1-Core 63.5
2-Core 127
51% 85.8 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 203
27% 203 Pts
64-Core 198
12% 198 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
MSI(1462 7A36) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.50.16.01
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
6.37% Terrible
Lighting 8.1
Reflection 8.2
Parallax 11.5
7% 9.27 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 9.2
Splatting 7.8
6% 7.07 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.37%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$35
395GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 371 351 359 369 373 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 424
Write 395
Mixed 349
SusWrite 362
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 59.4
4K Mixed 18.2
91% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 215
DQ Mixed 33.1
65% 129 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.M8FE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.9% Poor
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 9.6
28% 9.67 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 8.3
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M PRO-E (MS-7A36) Builds (Compare 759 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI A320M PRO-E (MS-7A36)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $290
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback