PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 1.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 3396 |
Memory | 13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20130716 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | May 06 '21 at 12:18 |
Run Duration | 175 Seconds |
Run User | SVN-User |
Background CPU | 25% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
|
67.7%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
HP(103C 3396) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276
|
1.33%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
167GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 310 304 308 316 297 MB/s
|
81%
Excellent
|
|||
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
466GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 581 524 537 537 558 468 MB/s
|
206%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52
3.5TB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 158 156 156 158 157 MB/s
|
84.2%
Excellent
|
|||
KINGSTON SA400S3 120GB
7GB free (System drive), PID 1068
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 16 19 19 19 18 MB/s
|
16.9%
Very poor
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 64GB-$23
10GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 13 13 13 13 MB/s
|
10.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BLS8G3D18ADS3.16FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
30.9%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 1,041x |
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 965x |
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 400x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 380x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 336x |
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples | 209x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $325 |