Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive290% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 30 '21 at 16:42
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$175
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 71
1-Core 115
2-Core 219
74% 135 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 570
59% 473 Pts
64-Core 917
57% 917 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$131
Sapphire(1DA2 E387) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.4.1
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.9% Above average
Lighting 65.7
Reflection 63.2
Parallax 88.9
54% 72.6 fps
MRender 65
Gravity 71.4
Splatting 47.2
49% 61.2 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$118
659GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1654 1550 1563 1561 1562 1561 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
290% Outstanding
Read 2,359
Write 2,146
Mixed 1,720
SusWrite 1,575
438% 1,950 MB/s
4K Read 51.4
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 67.2
219% 74.4 MB/s
DQ Read 848
DQ Write 534
DQ Mixed 749
543% 710 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 290%
Great: 410%
Hitachi HTS547550A9E384 500GB-$60
260GB free
Firmware: JE3OA60A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 72 73 74 73 73 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 76.9
Write 59.2
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 72.6
46% 62.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 50%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$34
439GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 160 161 163 163 163 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 142
Mixed 84.1
SusWrite 162
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 93%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 G.SKILL F4-3000C16-8GISB CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 G.SKILL F4-3000C16-8GISB 32GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62.3% Good
MC Read 23.6
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 21.5
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 21.4
SC Mixed 20.9
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 99.1
40% 99.1 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 5,633 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 133% - Outstanding Total price: $293
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback