Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6600-$130 80,688 User benchmarks, average bench 68% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 0.8 GHz Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	24.5% Poor	Memory 37.4 1-Core 23.6 2-Core 43 23% 34.7 Pts	4-Core 65.4 8-Core 85.7 10% 75.6 Pts	64-Core 85.4 5% 85.4 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 24.5% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% MSI(1462 8A9F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	2.92% Terrible	Lighting 3.5 Reflection 5.5 Parallax 0.9 3% 3.3 fps	MRender 4 Gravity 4.1 Splatting 3.3 3% 3.8 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.92% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
CDG-240GB-SSD25 240GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 156GB free (System drive) Firmware: 9A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 109 163 88 83 82 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	38.9% Below average	Read 364 Write 312 Mixed 300 SusWrite 138 62% 278 MB/s	4K Read 14.8 4K Write 33.8 4K Mixed 0.5 41% 16.4 MB/s	DQ Read 103 DQ Write 124 DQ Mixed 39.3 50% 88.5 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA851U6CJR6N-VK 1x4GB 631 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	24.2% Poor	MC Read 10.2 MC Write 10.3 MC Mixed 8.7 28% 9.73 GB/s	SC Read 0.6 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 0.5 5% 1.8 GB/s	Latency 215 19% 215 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 24.2% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	277x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	177x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	160x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 1x8GBCorsair $25Bench 42%, 47,473 samples	87x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	60x
HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 30,824 samples	53x

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $203

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16