Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics10.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 19 '21 at 08:20
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-9600 APU (2016 D.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
40.5% Average
Memory 46.7
1-Core 64.3
2-Core 128
45% 79.6 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 182
26% 192 Pts
64-Core 201
12% 201 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
AMD(1002 1E20) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Lighting 14.3
Reflection 14.2
Parallax 16.5
12% 15 fps
MRender 7.8
Gravity 9.3
Splatting 9
7% 8.7 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba P300 1TB-$45
876GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 142 145 159 134 145 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 114
Write 162
Mixed 54
SusWrite 144
86% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
143% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 107%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$45
931GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 189 186 190 193 189 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 188
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 188
106% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
134% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 107%
Great: 107%
USB DISK 28X 4GB
4GB free, PID 1a00
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 3.8 3.9 4.1 4.1 3.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
3.31% Terrible
Read 8.5
Write 3.3
Mixed 2.8
SusWrite 3.9
5% 4.62 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
19% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.31%
Great: 4%
Seagate Desktop 2TB
729GB free, PID 3300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 36 36 37 36 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 23.5
Write 25.9
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 36
34% 24.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
30% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FJ 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.7% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 13.7
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 9.6
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 173
23% 173 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 5,991 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $358
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback