Performance Results


Gaming 93% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 76% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	168% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	151% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Wacom MobileStudio Pro 16 (all builds)
Motherboard	Wacom Not Applicable
Memory	7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20191112
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 27 '22 at 10:54
Run Duration	233 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	34%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8559U 2,379 User benchmarks, average bench 78% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	56% Above average	Memory 71.7 1-Core 71.9 2-Core 178 60% 107 Pts	4-Core 218 8-Core 363 35% 291 Pts	64-Core 372 23% 372 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 90%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 8,316 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Quanta(152D 1214) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6999 Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	6.69% Terrible	Lighting 8 Reflection 144 Parallax 8.9 6% 53.5 fps	MRender 8.4 Gravity 7.4 Splatting 9.5 7% 8.43 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.69% Great: 10%
AMD RX 6900-XT-$1,000 16,057 User benchmarks, average bench 195% Sapphire(1DA2 440E) ≥ 4GB Ram: 16GB, Driver: 22.Q2 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	168% Outstanding	Lighting 202 Reflection 172 Parallax 464 164% 279 fps	MRender 295 Gravity 204 Splatting 311 224% 270 fps
Poor: 177% ↑ This bench: 168% Great: 209%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G 512GB 1,198 User benchmarks, average bench 172% 357GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20250000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 756 616 695 674 578 626 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	151% Outstanding	Read 889 Write 791 Mixed 752 SusWrite 657 174% 772 MB/s	4K Read 35.3 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 38 161% 61.5 MB/s	DQ Read 713 DQ Write 492 DQ Mixed 625 460% 610 MB/s
Poor: 120% ↑ This bench: 151% Great: 212%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GB 44,819 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (96^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	48.5% Average	MC Read 23.4 MC Write 17.6 MC Mixed 13.7 52% 18.2 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 10.7 SC Mixed 8.4 26% 9.2 GB/s	Latency 97.5 41% 97.5 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
Iris Graphics 550IntelBench 8%, 819 samples	29x
Iris Plus Graphics 655IntelBench 9%, 8,316 samples	22x
Quadro M1000MNvidiaBench 13%, 6,377 samples	9x

SSD
SM280512GPMC15B-S10C4 512GBPhisonBench 77%, 126 samples	24x
ESMP512GTB3C2-E8 512GBPhisonBench 116%, 41 samples	10x
CV1-8B512 512GBLiteonBench 86%, 2,348 samples	10x

RAM
H9CCNNNCLTMLAR-NTD 2x8GBHynixBench 73%, 165 samples	31x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	25x
H9CCNNNCLGALAR-NUD 2x8GBHynixBench 60%, 11,327 samples	4x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16