Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Crosshair V Formula  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120312
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateApr 12 '21 at 19:14
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD FX-8370-$190
AM3r2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 91.5
1-Core 80.6
2-Core 159
68% 110 Pts
4-Core 291
8-Core 505
50% 398 Pts
64-Core 500
34% 500 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290
Asus(1043 0428) 3GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 21.2.1
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.5% Below average
Lighting 39.7
Reflection 33.4
Parallax 51.2
32% 41.4 fps
MRender 29.2
Gravity 40
Splatting 22.8
31% 30.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 34%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$261
535GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 244 162 155 156 163 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
70% Very good
Read 451
Write 360
Mixed 233
SusWrite 199
69% 311 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 40.6
4K Mixed 26.8
91% 30.3 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 181
157% 233 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 70%
Great: 104%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$70
424GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 98 99 101 101 101 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 91.2
Write 90.6
Mixed 84.8
SusWrite 99.6
68% 91.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 78%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$40
168GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 68 68 68 68 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 74.2
Write 70.5
Mixed 53.4
SusWrite 67.8
49% 66.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
54.5% Above average
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 19.3
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 15.7
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 1,351 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $644
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-10700K $320Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $175
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback