| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 5.75% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| System | Default string (all builds) |
| Motherboard | INTEL X99 |
| Memory | 11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20201015 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 09 '21 at 16:44 |
| Run Duration | 117 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
|
64.3%
Good
|
63% 106 Pts
|
45% 375 Pts
|
37% 597 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 550-$79
AMD(1002 0B04) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1183 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.12.1
|
5.75%
Terrible
|
0% 9.37 fps
|
17% 20.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 87 92 96 103 102 MB/s
|
59.4%
Above average
|
67% 91.4 MB/s
|
151% 0.93 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate ST320LM001 HN-M3 320GB
10GB free
Firmware: 0002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 30 37 35 37 31 MB/s
|
16.8%
Very poor
|
22% 30.4 MB/s
|
83% 0.67 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown Ramsta-2666Mhz-8G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
54.9%
Above average
|
57% 19.8 GB/s
|
39% 13.7 GB/s
|
50% 80.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,593 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Default string
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E5-2620 v3IntelBench 66%, 6,890 samples | 1,022x |
| Xeon E5-2640 v3IntelBench 71%, 3,267 samples | 959x |
| Xeon E5-2670 v3IntelBench 66%, 3,953 samples | 908x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 487x |
| UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples | 478x |
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $238Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 460x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $87 |