MSI Z370 GODLIKE GAMING (MS-7A98)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 157%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 136%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics170% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive337% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A98
MotherboardMSI Z370 GODLIKE GAMING (MS-7A98)  (all builds)
Memory34.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200604
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateApr 06 '21 at 17:08
Run Duration539 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$177
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Memory 95.6
1-Core 150
2-Core 272
97% 173 Pts
4-Core 490
8-Core 662
73% 576 Pts
64-Core 881
54% 881 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$365
Zotac(19DA 5513) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2235 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
170% Outstanding
Lighting 229
Reflection 221
Parallax 280
186% 243 fps
MRender 286
Gravity 234
Splatting 185
187% 235 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 170%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB
476GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1341 1431 1549 1531 1523 1499 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
337% Outstanding
Read 3,146
Write 2,686
Mixed 1,030
SusWrite 1,479
464% 2,085 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 241
4K Mixed 62.9
276% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 949
DQ Write 736
DQ Mixed 770
596% 818 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 337%
Great: 372%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
323GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 472 482 199 94 79 110 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 452
Mixed 397
SusWrite 240
89% 396 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 57.8
192% 68.9 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 266
226% 331 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 111%
Great: 126%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
282GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 482 204 76 84 79 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 464
Mixed 400
SusWrite 232
88% 394 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 59.1
197% 69.9 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 266
226% 331 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 111%
Great: 126%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
199GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 471 481 296 162 154 165 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 477
Mixed 442
SusWrite 288
96% 425 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 56.5
191% 68.9 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 350
266% 359 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 113%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
76GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 442 465 438 475 477 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 456
Mixed 410
SusWrite 454
102% 455 MB/s
4K Read 40
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 50.1
185% 68 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 361
271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 121%
Great: 134%
Sabrent Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$30
237GB free
Firmware: 2210 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 357 359 358 389 392 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 398
Write 305
Mixed 331
SusWrite 370
79% 351 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 37.8
4K Mixed 25.8
83% 27.8 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 143
DQ Mixed 155
115% 152 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 223%
Seagate ST8000VN004-2M2101 8TB
5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 224 218 217 215 207 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 113%
Seagate ST8000VN004-2M2101 8TB
4TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 215 218 209 224 227 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 113%
Seagate ST8000VN004-2M2101 8TB
4TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 199 202 192 207 205 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 113%
Seagate ST8000VN004-2M2101 8TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 181 211 187 206 206 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 113%
WDC WD60 02FFWX-68TZ4N0 6TB
4TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 181
Write 138
Mixed 85
160% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 0.8
221% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 55%
ST8000VN 004-2M2101 8TB
5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 178
Write 118
Mixed 206
213% 167 MB/s
4K Read 9.3
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
58% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 80%
WDC WD60 02FFWX-68TZ4N0 6TB
978GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 184
Write 126
Mixed 82.2
152% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 0.7
238% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 55%
WDC WD60 02FFWX-68TZ4N0 6TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 140
Write 70.3
Mixed 73.8
108% 94.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 0.7
231% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 55%
ST10000V N0004-1ZD101 10TB
3.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.3 0.8 1.1 1 1.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.3% Above average
Read 249
Write 145
Mixed 136
SusWrite 0.8
154% 133 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1.2
266% 6.8 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 59%
ST10000V N0004-1ZD101 10TB
3.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.9 0.5 0.8 1.5 1.2 2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.1% Above average
Read 229
Write 107
Mixed 115
SusWrite 1.1
128% 113 MB/s
4K Read 13.2
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 1.1
236% 6.23 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 59%
ST10000V N0004-1ZD101 10TB
4TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 116 113 113 115 169 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
71% Very good
Read 202
Write 111
Mixed 111
SusWrite 124
172% 137 MB/s
4K Read 10.3
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 1.1
212% 5.13 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 71%
Great: 59%
ST10000V N0004-1ZD101 10TB
4TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 116 112 113 115 168 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
80.2% Excellent
Read 240
Write 172
Mixed 121
SusWrite 123
207% 164 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 1.1
261% 7.63 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 59%
ST8000VN 004-2M2101 8TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 43 63 61 66 67 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
63.8% Good
Read 192
Write 174
Mixed 211
SusWrite 57.2
210% 159 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.5
348% 13.6 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 80%
ST8000VN 004-2M2101 8TB
2TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 36 47 61 66 67 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
78.3% Very good
Read 284
Write 221
Mixed 358
SusWrite 56.4
303% 230 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1.3
363% 15.2 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 78%
ST8000VN 004-2M2101 8TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 7.4 62 61 66 67 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Read 238
Write 185
Mixed 252
SusWrite 53.8
236% 182 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1.4
369% 15.4 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 80%
ST8000VN 004-2M2101 8TB
7.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 124 185 179 199 199 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 259
Write 164
Mixed 226
SusWrite 177
271% 206 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.3
357% 15.2 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 101%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3400 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3400 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 38.1
MC Write 42.4
MC Mixed 34.8
110% 38.4 GB/s
SC Read 22.3
SC Write 43.7
SC Mixed 31.8
93% 32.6 GB/s
Latency 55.3
72% 55.3 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 108%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z370 GODLIKE GAMING (MS-7A98) Builds (Compare 138 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z370 GODLIKE GAMING (MS-7A98)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $920
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback