Gigabyte GA-H370 AORUS GAMING 3-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	54.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte H370AORUSGAMING3
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H370 AORUS GAMING 3-CF (all builds)
Memory	27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200916
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 06 '21 at 09:02
Run Duration	271 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700-$200 349,567 User benchmarks, average bench 87% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	95% Outstanding	Memory 88 1-Core 133 2-Core 247 87% 156 Pts	4-Core 548 8-Core 897 88% 723 Pts	64-Core 1,078 67% 1,078 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 95% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.3.1 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	54.5% Above average	Lighting 69.6 Reflection 65.2 Parallax 94.5 57% 76.4 fps	MRender 65.8 Gravity 74.9 Splatting 48.2 50% 63 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 56%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SX6000LNP 512GB 11,097 User benchmarks, average bench 187% 395GB free (System drive) Firmware: VC0S0285 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 1469 Write 1,123 Mixed 1,050 269% 1,214 MB/s	4K Read 41 4K Write 121 4K Mixed 59.2 202% 73.8 MB/s	DQ Read 977 DQ Write 1,024 DQ Mixed 940 723% 980 MB/s
Poor: 83% Great: 259%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 73GB free Firmware: SBFK71B1 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 447 Write 380 Mixed 320 85% 382 MB/s	4K Read 28.7 4K Write 87.5 4K Mixed 29.1 127% 48.4 MB/s	DQ Read 232 DQ Write 318 DQ Mixed 168 157% 239 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 28GB free Firmware: SBFK71B1 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 441 Write 286 Mixed 308 76% 345 MB/s	4K Read 28.6 4K Write 86.4 4K Mixed 29.3 127% 48.1 MB/s	DQ Read 230 DQ Write 313 DQ Mixed 172 158% 238 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
Asmt USB 3.0 Destop H 128GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 119GB free Firmware: 0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 370 Write 165 Mixed 348 65% 294 MB/s	4K Read 18.5 4K Write 38.7 4K Mixed 25.5 81% 27.6 MB/s	DQ Read 110 DQ Write 173 DQ Mixed 63.7 70% 115 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 65%
Asmt USB 3.0 Destop H 128GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 64GB free Firmware: 0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 359 Write 208 Mixed 219 58% 262 MB/s	4K Read 20.5 4K Write 37 4K Mixed 20.5 77% 26 MB/s	DQ Read 156 DQ Write 176 DQ Mixed 74.4 81% 135 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 65%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 111GB free Firmware: CC45 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 108 Write 85 Mixed 72.5 66% 88.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 216GB free Firmware: CC45 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 151 Write 119 Mixed 74 85% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
Asmt 2115 2TB 399 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 336GB free Firmware: 0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 98 Write 84.5 Mixed 72.2 64% 84.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 102%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 4,752 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 398GB free, PID b207 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 83.7 Write 84.2 Mixed 33 81% 67 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.5 77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 50%
VendorCo ProductCode 1TB 444 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 970GB free, PID 1234 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 22.2 Write 0.5 Mixed 1.7 6% 8.13 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 18% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 14%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 029E CMK16GX4M2D2666C16 029E CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 029E CMK16GX4M2D2666C16 32GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	72.4% Very good	MC Read 25.2 MC Write 27.9 MC Mixed 22.3 72% 25.1 GB/s	SC Read 17.4 SC Write 31.1 SC Mixed 23.4 68% 24 GB/s	Latency 69.6 58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H370 AORUS GAMING 3-CF Builds (Compare 415 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 53%

Yacht

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 49%

Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H370 AORUS GAMING 3-CF

CPU
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	118x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	85x
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	50x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	35x
RTX 3060Nvidia $279Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	28x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	27x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	18x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	15x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	13x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	19x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	17x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 96% - Outstanding

Total price: $344

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16