Today's hottest deals

Asus N61Jq

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus N61Jq  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N61Jq
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100330
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 03 '21 at 22:00
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 720-$220
Socket 989, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
59.2% Above average
Memory 91.9
1-Core 59.4
2-Core 105
56% 85.3 Pts
4-Core 150
8-Core 199
22% 175 Pts
64-Core 204
13% 204 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Mobility Radeon HD 5730
Asus(1043 1C22) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
4.53% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 9.2
Parallax 5.2
5% 6.7 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 5.5
4% 5.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.53%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kioxia-exceria SATA SSD 480GB
376GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA15.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 170 144 140 145 142 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.5% Poor
Read 194
Write 108
Mixed 91.3
SusWrite 158
31% 138 MB/s
4K Read 11.4
4K Write 15.1
4K Mixed 9.1
37% 11.9 MB/s
DQ Read 19.3
DQ Write 19.5
DQ Mixed 17.1
14% 18.6 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ASU1333D3S9DR8/2G 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
41.1% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 13.3
40% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 11.4
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N61Jq Builds (Compare 90 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N61Jq

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $259
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback