Today's hottest deals

Asus N71Jq

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus N71Jq  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N71Jq
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 19 '22 at 11:17
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 720-$220
Socket 989, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Memory 93.2
1-Core 58.9
2-Core 89.3
54% 80.5 Pts
4-Core 151
8-Core 190
22% 170 Pts
64-Core 190
12% 190 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Mobility Radeon HD 5730
Asus(1043 1C22) 1GB
Driver: atiu9p64 aticfx64 aticfx64 atiu9pag aticfx32 aticfx32 atiumd64 atidxx64 atidxx64 atiumdag atidxx32 atidxx32 atiumdva atiumd6a atitmm64 Ver. 8.692.1.0
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
4% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 6.1
Parallax 4.9
4% 5.43 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.5
3% 4.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK7575GSX 750GB-$63
427GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GT001C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 65 50 59 67 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 67.5
Write 67.8
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 59
40% 54.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
78% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M471B5273CH0-CK0 80CE M471B5173DB0-YK0 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.2% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 11
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 9.4
26% 9.1 GB/s
Latency 61.5
65% 61.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N71Jq Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N71Jq

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $395
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback