ECS A780GM-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics6.02% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive38.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardECS A780GM-A  (all builds)
Memory2.3 GB free of 5 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090202
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 27 '17 at 19:33
Run Duration285 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon X3 435
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
29.4% Poor
Memory 46.5
1-Core 39.4
2-Core 72.4
33% 52.8 Pts
4-Core 68.1
8-Core 98.3
10% 83.2 Pts
64-Core 105
6% 105 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670
XFX(1682 3181) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
6.02% Terrible
Lighting 7.93
Reflection 7.46
Parallax 6.81
6% 7.4 fps
MRender 6.76
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 6.09
5% 6.35 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.02%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial_FCCT250MX200SSD1 250GB
146GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU04 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.7% Below average
Read 194
Write 172
Mixed 121
36% 163 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 36.9
4K Mixed 15.2
61% 22.1 MB/s
DQ Read 27.7
DQ Write 59.5
DQ Mixed 16.1
20% 34.4 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 110%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
370GB free, PID a006
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
7.06% Terrible
Read 21.4
Write 12.5
Mixed 4.43
14% 12.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.21
4K Write 0.39
4K Mixed 0.03
15% 0.21 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 7.06%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 5GB
null MHz
2048, 1024, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
14.5% Very poor
MC Read 4.8
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 5
14% 5 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 4
9% 3.23 GB/s
Latency 174
23% 174 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A780GM-A Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS A780GM-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback