Dell OptiPlex 755

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell OptiPlex 755
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 755  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080430
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 25 '17 at 19:28
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User DOM-User
Background CPU 58%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E4600
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Memory 61.1
1-Core 25.7
2-Core 41
31% 42.6 Pts
4-Core 34.9
8-Core 50.2
5% 42.6 Pts
64-Core 50.5
3% 50.5 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 40%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3808110AS 80GB-$33
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AAE Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
25.1% Poor
Read 49.9
Write 37.9
Mixed 29.3
29% 39 MB/s
4K Read 0.02
4K Write 0.32
4K Mixed 0.2
29% 0.18 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 41%
Jmicron 80GB
19GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 30.3
Write 25.2
Mixed 14.1
28% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.26
4K Write 1.53
4K Mixed 0.21
60% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 27%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB
3GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 23.3
Write 17.9
22% 20.6 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4GB
null MHz
2048, 1024, 1024 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.2% Very poor
MC Read 4.5
MC Write 3.4
MC Mixed 3.3
11% 3.73 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 3.1
8% 2.87 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 755 Builds (Compare 499 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 755

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $128
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback