Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H DDR3-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.21% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte H110M-S2H DDR3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-S2H DDR3-CF  (all builds)
Memory1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180412
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 16 '21 at 17:28
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 71%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$113
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
35.4% Below average
Memory 34.2
1-Core 107
2-Core 200
58% 114 Pts
4-Core 197
8-Core 312
31% 255 Pts
64-Core 273
17% 273 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
5.21% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 3.2
Parallax 7
6% 5.67 fps
MRender 3.4
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 6.2
5% 5.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.21%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3Z40107
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 371
Write 314
Mixed 18.7
51% 234 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 9.9
4K Mixed 0.8
33% 9.43 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 81.2
DQ Mixed 0.7
29% 72.2 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
103GB free
Firmware: 0707
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 34 35 41 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Read 27
Write 38.6
Mixed 34.5
SusWrite 37.2
26% 34.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.5
162% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5403-159.A01LF 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
19% Very poor
MC Read 7.1
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 5.7
19% 6.7 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 5.8
16% 5.57 GB/s
Latency 231
17% 231 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-S2H DDR3-CF Builds (Compare 101 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H DDR3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $65
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback