| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 27.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 151% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| System | GPU GWTN156-2BK (all builds) |
| Motherboard | GPU GPU Company |
| Memory | 3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20200810 |
| Uptime | 0.3 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 26 '21 at 03:12 |
| Run Duration | 115 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 5% |
PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
|
51.1%
Above average
|
46% 83.2 Pts
|
65% 565 Pts
|
60% 969 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Device(1D05 1104) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.40.52
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.6%
Poor
|
24% 32.8 fps
|
34% 41.9 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
|
53.5%
Above average
|
57% 20.1 GB/s
|
41% 14.2 GB/s
|
19% 206 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GWTN156-2BK Builds (Compare 48 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: GPU GWTN156-2BK
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)AMDBench 13%, 162,082 samples | 25x |
| GeForce GTX 1650NvidiaBench 40%, 34,471 samples | 23x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |