Alaska A_M_I

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics88.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive83.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAlaska A_M_I  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory21.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140724
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 16 '17 at 23:30
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4820K
, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Memory 91.2
1-Core 125
2-Core 232
85% 149 Pts
4-Core 403
8-Core 596
62% 500 Pts
64-Core 602
37% 602 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.36
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Lighting 112
Reflection 117
Parallax 101
91% 110 fps
MRender 98.7
Gravity 105
Splatting 100
83% 101 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$72
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Read 508
Write 354
Mixed 354
90% 405 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 68.3
4K Mixed 24.5
132% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 44.8
DQ Write 77.4
DQ Mixed 21.4
27% 47.9 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
354GB free
Firmware: CC27 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Read 158
Write 144
Mixed 125
107% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 1.45
4K Mixed 0.34
80% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLT8G3D1608DT2TXO 1x8GB
1 of 3 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
81.9% Excellent
MC Read 30.6
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 30.2
89% 31 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 14
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A_M_I Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Alaska A_M_I

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $143
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback