Alaska A_M_I

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics90.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive92.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAlaska A_M_I  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory28.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140724
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 20 '16 at 07:48
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4820K
, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Memory 95.2
1-Core 126
2-Core 239
87% 153 Pts
4-Core 460
8-Core 621
68% 540 Pts
64-Core 621
38% 621 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7306
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 120
Parallax 102
94% 113 fps
MRender 98.9
Gravity 105
Splatting 105
84% 103 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$72
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 354
Mixed 356
90% 407 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 62.4
4K Mixed 27
132% 43.9 MB/s
DQ Read 321
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 80.1
107% 198 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1TB free
Firmware: CC27 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Read 140
Write 152
Mixed 138
108% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.78
4K Write 1.35
4K Mixed 0.31
92% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLT8G3D1608DT2TXO 1x8GB
1 of 3 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 37.6
MC Write 41.5
MC Mixed 38
112% 39 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 14.7
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 56.6
71% 56.6 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 101%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A_M_I Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Alaska A_M_I

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $143
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback