Toshiba SATELLITE C855-22N

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE C855-22N (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel PLCSF8
Memory	2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130403
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Jan 06 '21 at 21:50
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	ISL-User
Background CPU	58%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100 61,311 User benchmarks, average bench 49% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	58.4% Above average	Memory 83.5 1-Core 52.8 2-Core 102 51% 79.5 Pts	4-Core 195 8-Core 200 26% 197 Pts	64-Core 196 12% 196 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Toshiba(1179 FB31) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	3.18% Terrible	Lighting 3.9 Reflection 1.8 Parallax 2.7 3% 2.8 fps	MRender 4.4 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 4.7 3% 3.8 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.18% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba A100 120GB 1,960 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 37GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFA10.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 92 72 39 93 23 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	57.4% Above average	Read 456 Write 274 Mixed 326 SusWrite 81.5 63% 284 MB/s	4K Read 30.4 4K Write 31.8 4K Mixed 8.7 74% 23.6 MB/s	DQ Read 292 DQ Write 310 DQ Mixed 204 180% 269 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 89%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB 4,649 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 0GB free, PID null Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 31.6 Write 9.9 Mixed 18.7 22% 20.1 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 2.1 138% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 40%
Generic- Multi-Card 128GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 70GB free, PID 0138 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 13 12 11 13 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	6.37% Terrible	Read 18.5 Write 13.7 Mixed 8.7 SusWrite 13 17% 13.5 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 17% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.37% Great: 15%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 M471B5273CH0-CK0 8GB 321 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	52.5% Above average	MC Read 19.4 MC Write 19.2 MC Mixed 17.5 53% 18.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 13.5 SC Mixed 13.8 38% 13.2 GB/s	Latency 74.3 54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SATELLITE C855-22N Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE C855-22N

CPU
Core i5-3230MIntel $100Bench 49%, 61,311 samples	7x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	7x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	2x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5273CH0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 5,120 samples	2x
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 27%, 17,632 samples	1x
M471B5173BH0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 26%, 3,473 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 50% - Average

Total price: $152

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16