Samsung 730QCJ/730QCR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.96% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive145% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 78% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemSamsung 730QCJ/730QCR  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP730QCJ-K02US
Memory7.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201224
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '21 at 13:50
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 29%
CPU Throttled 78%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10510U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
64.3% Good
Memory 66.7
1-Core 99.6
2-Core 202
68% 123 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 495
52% 414 Pts
64-Core 525
32% 525 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Sanyo(144D C832) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7870
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
5.96% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 6.7
Parallax 8.3
5% 7.07 fps
MRender 9
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 11.3
8% 9.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.96%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sn730 SDBQNTY-512G-1004 512GB
416GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11100104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1084 936 969 969 884 952 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
145% Outstanding
Read 913
Write 845
Mixed 768
SusWrite 966
197% 873 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 90.3
4K Mixed 23.5
100% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 541
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 469
344% 455 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 145%
Great: 254%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CTD M471A5244CB0-CTD 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
51.7% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 15.4
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 14.6
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 109
36% 109 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 730QCJ/730QCR Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 730QCJ/730QCR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback