Samsung 950QCG

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive254% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 86% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemSamsung 950QCG  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP950QCG-K01US
Memory4.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200414
Uptime6 Days
Run DateNov 27 '20 at 21:35
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
CPU Throttled 86%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1065G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 69.7
1-Core 104
2-Core 251
75% 141 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 555
64% 497 Pts
64-Core 541
34% 541 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus G7
Sanyo(144D C189) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8853
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 17
Reflection 15.3
Parallax 18.6
14% 17 fps
Gravity 18.2
Splatting 0.2
7% 9.2 fps
Poor: 6% Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sn730 SDBQNTY-512G-1004 512GB
327GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11100104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1250 995 990 991 1000 912 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
254% Outstanding
Read 1,929
Write 1,953
Mixed 1600
SusWrite 1,023
365% 1,626 MB/s
4K Read 49.8
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 71.3
243% 88.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,105
DQ Write 668
DQ Mixed 867
651% 880 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 254%
Great: 254%
SMI USB DISK 16GB
15GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 5 5 5 5.1 5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
4.61% Terrible
Read 20.7
Write 1.8
Mixed 2.7
SusWrite 4.9
7% 7.53 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.61%
Great: 26%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4U6E3S4AA-MGCL K4UBE3D4AA-MGCL 12GB
4267, 4267 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
MC Read 35
MC Write 32.8
MC Mixed 29.4
93% 32.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 29.6
SC Mixed 26.5
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 950QCG Builds (Compare 112 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 950QCG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback