Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics60.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive213% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory59 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200820
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '21 at 18:14
Run Duration292 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 93%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$325
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Memory 64.2
1-Core 158
2-Core 308
92% 177 Pts
4-Core 613
8-Core 1183
107% 898 Pts
64-Core 2,207
137% 2,207 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$270
Gigabyte(1458 4009) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2280 MHz, MLim: 3629 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
60.9% Good
Lighting 69.8
Reflection 77
Parallax 74.7
57% 73.8 fps
MRender 121
Gravity 75.8
Splatting 65
69% 87.2 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$70
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1364 389 386 348 371 394 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
213% Outstanding
Read 1,541
Write 1,674
Mixed 831
SusWrite 542
256% 1,147 MB/s
4K Read 57.2
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 72.9
249% 86.9 MB/s
DQ Read 990
DQ Write 837
DQ Mixed 942
698% 923 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 213%
Great: 302%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
442GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2153 591 606 611 524 616 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
268% Outstanding
Read 2,164
Write 2,005
Mixed 1,490
SusWrite 850
364% 1,627 MB/s
4K Read 59.7
4K Write 93.8
4K Mixed 78.5
241% 77.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,363
DQ Write 1,045
DQ Mixed 1,152
876% 1,187 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 268%
Great: 340%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$95
2.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 133 134 119 130 136 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Read 164
Write 180
Mixed 43.8
SusWrite 128
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$95
1TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 143 145 129 139 148 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 146
Write 132
Mixed 31.1
SusWrite 138
81% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
151% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 107%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 153 151 136 144 154 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Read 149
Write 148
Mixed 85.6
SusWrite 144
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 139 140 123 132 142 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 163
Write 160
Mixed 96.9
SusWrite 132
102% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.1
184% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 101%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$95
1TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 143 142 127 138 146 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Read 152
Write 148
Mixed 38.2
SusWrite 137
86% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
176% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 107%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
836GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 101 116 116 100 117 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 28.5
Write 108
Mixed 62.8
SusWrite 110
57% 77.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
196% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 101%
Generic Mass-Storage 16GB
10GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 5 5.4 4.6 5.8 5.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
2.71% Terrible
Read 10.5
Write 1
Mixed 2.8
SusWrite 5.1
5% 4.85 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
1% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.71%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.5% Good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 23.3
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 25.4
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 11,102 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $262

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $1,261
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback