Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive159% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DT
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200922
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '21 at 16:02
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H Vega Mobile Gfx
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
65.7% Good
Memory 69.1
1-Core 107
2-Core 202
70% 126 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 509
52% 423 Pts
64-Core 545
34% 545 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 67%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$58
411GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 815 825 831 881 856 896 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
159% Outstanding
Read 1,138
Write 861
Mixed 770
SusWrite 851
203% 905 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 61
4K Mixed 44.1
150% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 333
DQ Write 356
DQ Mixed 339
257% 343 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 159%
Great: 209%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
169GB free
Firmware: S3Z40107
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 394 390 407 391 138 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Read 458
Write 403
Mixed 383
SusWrite 349
90% 398 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 62.4
4K Mixed 18.7
98% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 220
DQ Mixed 44.2
71% 133 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK CT8G4SFRA266.C4FE 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
67.1% Good
MC Read 26.2
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 22.5
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 25.5
SC Mixed 19.1
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT Builds (Compare 2,848 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback